Corporate Credit Rating for BPOWER ENERGIA SRL: B1- (First Issuance)

modefinance has published on the website the Corporate Credit Rating (Solicited) of BPOWER ENERGIA SRL, assigning the rating of B1- (First Issuance). The analysis highlights that the company has an adequate financial position, appearing capable of withstanding adverse economic conditions in the medium and long term.

BPOWER operates in the liberalized electricity and natural gas market, with nationwide coverage and a focus on residential customers and SMEs. The Company adopts a commercial model based on a network of directly appointed agents, supported by digital tools, CRM systems, and a dedicated back office. The offering is complemented by customer support and after-sales services, with particular emphasis on the quality of customer relationship and on the development of solutions aimed at improving energy efficiency and promoting sustainability.

The Company’s solvency profile stands at an overall very strong level, supported by an excellent degree of capitalization. Financial exposure is widely sustainable, underpinned by a cash-positive financial position. Liquidity management is confirmed to be sound. Lastly, the Company’s profitability profile is at an excellent level and remains stable compared to the previous financial year.

BPOWER ENERGIA S.R.L. has a clearly identifiable corporate structure, with Mr. Giovanni Bellomo as the sole shareholder, who also serves as the Company’s sole director. A statutory auditor is also in place.

In terms of size positioning, the Company ranks below the sector median, positioning itself among the smaller entities within its reference peer group. With regard to solvency, the Company shows a broadly strong positioning. In terms of profitability, BPOWER ranks above the sector median, with indicators reflecting an overall solid performance level.

In 2024, the Italian energy market experienced a phase of stabilization, with electricity and gas prices declining as a result of increased renewable energy production, lower consumption, and favorable weather conditions. Nevertheless, prices remain above pre-crisis levels, mainly due to continued reliance on fossil fuels, which are more expensive and volatile. Renewable sources, particularly solar and hydroelectric power, accounted for 50% of electricity production. To support this energy transition, Terna launched €2.3 billion of strategic infrastructure investments and introduced MACSE, a new mechanism to incentivize energy storage, with initial auctions scheduled for 2025. The EU increased the share of LNG in its gas imports (from 20% in 2021 to 38% in 2024), offsetting the reduction in Russian gas through new terminals such as those in Piombino and Ravenna. Gas storage reached record levels, with 90% of winter 2025/26 capacity already allocated by April 2025. Nonetheless, structural vulnerabilities persist, including dependence on imports and exposure to geopolitical and climate-related risks, which require ongoing monitoring.

Macroeconomically, economic activity in Italy remained subdued in Q4 2024, reflecting continued weakness in manufacturing and a slowdown in services and construction. These sectors, however, continued to record modest expansion, partly supported by the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR). Domestic demand was constrained by slower household spending and still unfavorable investment conditions. In autumn, Italian goods exports were hindered by a sharp decline in global demand, and protectionist policies announced by the new U.S. administration are expected to negatively affect exports to the U.S. market. According to the latest projections from the Bank of Italy, GDP grew by 0.5% in 2024 and is expected to expand at an average annual rate of around 1% over the 2025–2027 period.

In the following table, the addressing factors, actions or events that could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade are summarized: 

The present Corporate Credit rating is published by modefinance under EU Regulation 1060/2009 and following amendments.

The present rating is solicited and is based on both private and public information. The rated entity and/or related third parties have provided all private information used. modefinance had access to some accounts and other relevant internal documents of the rated entity and/or related third parties. Solicited and unsolicited ratings issued by modefinance are of comparable quality, as the solicitation status has no effect on methodologies used. More comprehensive information on modefinance Corporate Credit Ratings are available at http://cra.modefinance.com/en

The present Corporate Credit Rating is issued on MORE Methodology 2.0 and Rating Methodology 1.0. A comprehensive description of both methodologies, as well as information on modefinance Rating Scale and Mappings, is available at http://cra.modefinance.com/en/methodologies.

For information on historical default rates of modefinance Corporate Credit Ratings please refer to ESMA Central Repository and ESMA European Rating Platform.

modefinance adopts the following definition of default: a company in bankruptcy, in involuntary liquidation, in controlled administration, or that is insolvent with respect to an expired financial commitment. 

The quality of the information available for evaluating the rating of the analyzed company has been judged by modefinance as satisfactory.

Please note that modefinance does not perform any audit activity and is not in a position to guarantee the accuracy of any information used and/or reported in the present document. As such, modefinance can accept no liability whatsoever for actions taken based on any information that may subsequently prove to be incorrect.

The present credit rating was notified to the rated entity in order to identify potential factual errors, as prescribed by the CRA Regulation.

No amendments were applied after the notification process.

The rated company purchased ancillary services from modefinance (preliminary rating). Modefinance guarantees that this purchase of ancillary activities does not constitute any conflict of interest.

The rating action issued by modefinance was performed independently. The analysts, members of the rating team involved in the process, modefinance Srl and its members and shareholders do not have any conflicts of interest in relation to the Rated Entity and/or Related Third Parties. If in the future a potential conflict of interest is identified in relation to the people reported above, modefinance Ratings will provide the appropriate information and if necessary, the rating will be withdrawn.

The present Credit Rating is an opinion of the general creditworthiness that modefinance issues on the rated entity and should be relied upon to a limited degree. The issued rating is subject to ongoing monitoring until withdrawal.

Head Analyst - Tommaso Viola, Rating Analyst
tommaso.viola@modefinance.com

Responsible for Rating Approval - Pinar Dilek, Rating Process Manager
pinar.dilek@modefinance.com